Arbitration
Agreement
The UNCITRAL Model Law defines an arbitration agreement as "an
agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which
have arisen or which may arise between them in respect of a defined legal
relationship, whether contractual or not." This means that parties agrees
to settle their disputes in arbitration process instead of public litigation.
Basically, parties can choose which kind of disputes fall under the
arbitration. It can mean that all disputes arising out of their legal relationship
are to be settled in the arbitration process, or on the other hand, parties can
choose that only certain kinds of them falls under it. Also, as the wording of
the definition states, the arbitration agreement can be drafted before or after
the dispute has arisen.
The arbitration agreement also defines the scope of the arbitral
tribunal's jurisdiction. The arbitral tribunal does not have jurisdiction over
the matters which are not covered by the arbitration agreement made by the
parties. In other words, if the parties have agreed to settle certain kinds of
disputes in the arbitration, the tribunal has no jurisdiction over other
matters.
There are two types of arbitration agreements: "separate"
arbitration agreements and arbitration clauses. Separate arbitration agreements
are those which constitute a whole new agreement, where parties agrees to
settle their dispute in arbitration. Arbitration clause means a provision,
included in the contract between parties, which contains an obligation to
settle disputes in arbitration.
National arbitration laws can set out different requirements for the
form of the arbitration agreement. The main rule is that the arbitration
agreement must be in writing. However, the requirement is pretty loose, because
the requirement can be fulfilled by the exchange of letter or telegrams, or in
otherwise documented way.
Seat of Arbitration
Basically, the concept of the seat of arbitration determines the
procedural rules of the arbitration proceedings. It refers to the geographical
and legal jurisdiction to which the arbitration process is tied. In other
words, it is the place where the arbitration is held. For example, the
arbitration agreement can state that the proceedings are to be held "in
London under the rules of the ICC". Parties are free to identify the seat
of arbitration. If they fail to do so, the seat is implied from an express
choice of law governing the procedure. For example, if the arbitration
agreement states that the dispute is settled in accordance with Indian law, the
seat is considered to be in India.
No comments:
Post a Comment